Edge-Sorting

Edge-Sorting is a technique used in the casino sportbook malaysia to gain an edge. Here the player determines whether the card is a face (value of 10) or a low card. The player carefully analyzes whether there are unintentional differences on the back of the dealt cards. Many decks that have been produced have unintentional, and almost impossible to distinguish, deviations in the patterns and edges.

• The back of a deck is identical, but the edges of each card are distinguishable from one to the other. The reverse side of the pattern is no longer symmetrical when the card is rotated 180 degrees (half a full turn).
• While playing, a player can ask a dealer if the high value cards can be turned 180 degrees as it brings them luck. If the dealer heeds this, the player has the advantage. Furthermore, the player must ask whether an automatic shuffling machine is used, so that the pattern remains the same.
• The dealer does not have to meet these requirements, but they usually do, in order to gain the trust of the player or to remove any suspicion. Casinos view the Edge-Sorting technique as cheating, while many players believe it is a legitimate way to gain an edge.

Phil Ivey used Edge-Sorting at Baccarat

In 2012, poker player Phil Ivey and Cheung Yin Sun partnered to win $ 9.6 million with Baccarat at the Borgata Casino. In 2014, a lawsuit was filed for their winnings. In 2016, the judge ruled that Phil and Cheung must pay back $ 10 million to Borgata.

Although they had not committed fraud, according to the court, they did break the contract with the casino. For example, it was indicated that according to the law it is not allowed to mark cards. While they haven’t marked any cards, they’ve used the tiny imperfections in the back of the cards’ pattern to their own advantage.

Lots of money
In 2012, Phil Ivey reportedly won £ 7.7 million playing Punto Banco (version of Baccarat) at Crockfords Casino in London. Crockford gave him his £ 1 million stake and agreed to send the winnings, but the casino eventually refused the payout. Phil Ivey sued them for this, but lost the case in the High Court.

The verdict was that Edge-Sorting is a form of cheating. It was also accepted that Phil Ivey and others using this technique were unaware of cheating, and the casino could easily protect itself by coming up with better material (no imperfections in the pattern of the back of a deck).

According to the court, Phil repeatedly used his own dealer, making demands that led to his being able to use Edge-Sorting while playing. Ultimately, Phil Ivey lost the lawsuit on all counts. The case was settled on the basis that dishonesty is not necessarily an element of cheating.